In a world where brands are built in milliseconds and are judged in moments, tracking brand health has never been more important—or more challenging. As market dynamics shift and consumer journeys fragment, many brands are discovering that their traditional tracking systems are no longer fit for purpose. Why do so many programs fall short, and what can brands do differently to unlock real commercial impact?
Contact us to transform your brand health tracking
Why Uniform Brand Tracking Fails Modern Brands
Brands don’t all build revenue in the same way. Some grow by driving high volumes—appealing to as many buyers as possible—while others succeed by commanding a price premium, even if their audience is smaller. Traditional tracking systems often overlook this duality, treating all brands as if they compete on the same terms. But in reality, such a uniform approach misses the nuances that drive commercial performance.
For example:
- Mainstream brands enjoy wide appeal but may lack the pricing power to retain their volume when competitors cut prices
- Exclusive brands benefit from a strong premium positioning among a narrower audience. Building volume without sacrificing their desirability is a challenge
- Power brands balance both, achieving wide appeal and strong pricing power
Why Traditional Brand Tracking Misses the Mark
Traditional trackers tell you what people buy, not why they buy it. To really get under the skin of your brand health, you need to understand:
- Which category entry points make people think about your brand—and which you are missing out on
- What people think of your brand when they encounter it
- Whether consumers are forming a strong emotional connection with your brand
If your brand tracker isn’t giving you this level of insight, you risk missing the signals that matter most—and making decisions that leave growth on the table.
Over-Reliance on Short-Term Metrics
The pressure to deliver immediate results is real. In many organizations, this leads to an over-reliance on sales activation—discounts, promotions, and targeted campaigns—at the expense of long-term brand building. While these tactics can spike sales in the short term, they rarely build sustainable equity and can even erode pricing power over time.
The most successful brands balance long-term brand building with short-term activation. Yet, few tracking systems help marketers find this balance or demonstrate the commercial value of investing in brand equity.
Why Not All Brand Health Metrics Drive Growth
Many tracking programs focus on what’s easy to measure, not what matters most. Traditional trackers may capture awareness or preference, but they don’t reveal the link to commercial performance—leaving a gap between what’s measured and what actually drives business results.
Truly effective brand tracking needs to go further. It still needs to tell you what people think and feel about your brand but should also tell you if it’s easy to find and buy. Without these insights, you’re missing the real levers that influence both sales volume and pricing power.
And if you’re not measuring what truly matters, you may fail to convert brand potential into in-market performance—leaving growth, margin, and competitive advantage on the table.
Conclusion: A New Approach with Actionable, Commercially Relevant Insights
Ultimately, the goal of brand health tracking is to inform better decisions and drive growth. But too often, data is collected without a clear plan for action. Brands need measurement systems that not only diagnose issues but also provide actionable recommendations, with brand health linked directly to commercial outcomes. Such insights will help marketers activate existing equity, optimize strategies, and invest for long-term growth.
So, if traditional tracking leaves growth on the table, what’s the alternative? In Part 2, we explore how NIQ’s Brand Architect transforms brand health into a growth engine by linking brand health directly to commercial outcomes.
