The Good: Instacart is a high-growth tactic for retailers with low investment
Instacart has changed the way people buy groceries. Many retailers have sought alliances with the platform to serve as their sole e-commerce arm. Instacart delivers a turnkey e-commerce solution for retailers looking to avoid hefty capital and resource investments to meet shopper demand. With the growing proliferation of retail curbside pickup options, Instacart offers a meaningful service to meet customer needs while leveraging existing retail infrastructure. In return, Instacart takes a cut of sales through targeted price increases and order fees.
Even retailers that have invested in their own e-commerce platforms use Instacart to reach a wider shopper base. Instacart’s shoppers are more affluent and spend more online than buyers from any other e-commerce retailer, according to NielsenIQ’s e-commerce data. With its growing cross-channel shopper base, Instacart provides retailers an expanded audience of shoppers who would otherwise not purchase from their retailer-branded sites.
Whether it’s speed to market, cost avoidance, or an opportunity to expand their shopper base—not to mention the triple-digit online growth many retailers have experienced through Instacart—the benefits of jumping on the “Instacart bandwagon” have never been more clear. What’s less clear is the non-monetary cost it bears on retailers.
The latest on Instacart
Are you looking for the latest data on Instacart’s performance during the pandemic? Discover how these findings could impact your business and if you should be adjusting your e-commerce strategy.
The Bad: Retailers cede control over the customer relationship
From Costco to Sephora to 7-Eleven, Instacart has digitized commerce for consumers’ benefit; however, Instacart has opened the doors to some retailers’ digital storefronts without their involvement, and at times misaligned with their broader digital strategies. Retailers without Instacart relationships are flying blind to the Instacart effect on their brick-and-mortar stores. Traditional tactics such as merchandise displays and in-store promotions do not achieve their intended lift, because more and more in-store transactions are originated online by customers who never see the store shelves or displays.
Instacart’s 700,000 in-store shoppers mix with customers across store aisles and checkout lanes, disrupting the store environment. Out-of-stocks driven by unseen online demand and lack of visibility of in-store inventory and online product substitutions further mar the physical store shopping experience. Retailers can benefit greatly from engaging directly with Instacart to take ownership of their presence on Instacart’s platform, their in-store Instacart dynamics, and the platform’s rich data from Instacart shoppers.
Retailers that enter into partnerships with Instacart should proceed with caution. By outsourcing elements of the end-to-end e-commerce experience to Instacart, retailers cede control over the customer relationship—most critically, their customer data—to a third party, in turn causing some grocers to question the relationship.
Take a lesson from Target (2001–11), Toys ‘R’ Us (2000–17), and Borders (2001–08). In the early 2000s, these retailers were brick-and-mortar giants in their respective categories, looking to meet growing customer demand for e-commerce. They handed over their e-commerce capabilities to a niche, digital-first e-tailer’s white-label platform. The digital experience was highly templated, delivering standardized features and functionality, offering very little differentiation in customer experience. By the time Toys ‘R’ Us and Borders built their own offerings, it was too late. Both retailers lagged competitors in establishing a viable online business and succumbed to bankruptcy. Target got out just in time, given their category breadth. That little-known white-label service was Amazon’s early foray into accelerating digital commerce adoption and fundamentally changing the way people shopped for durable goods—which hit an inflection point nearly 15 years ago.
That same inflection point is happening within the grocery industry now. Amazon knows the value of owning the transaction and customer relationship better than anyone. When they entered the grocery space by acquiring Whole Foods, Amazon discontinued what was Instacart’s largest retailer relationship at the time and brought Whole Foods’ e-commerce service in-house via Amazon Prime Now.
Retailers need to invest in their own digital offerings to work in parallel with Instacart. To succeed, retailers must leverage digital shopper data to inform their strategies both in-store and online, and work to ultimately win back the transaction from Instacart or risk losing increasingly important shopper touchpoints.
The Ugly: Instacart eliminates retail partners from the equation
The decisions retailers make regarding their Instacart engagements today will have lasting effects, both positive and negative, on their long-term business success. Regardless of the decision each retailer makes, Instacart is in the business of continuing its record-setting growth. But there will be a time when Instacart’s land-and-expand strategy will reach the point of diminishing returns. Shopping physical retail stores and delivering groceries to homes is a negative-margin business today. Profits come in optimizing the efficiency of online grocery fulfillment through dark stores and automation.
Unable to control retailers directly, Instacart will develop a way to fulfill orders themselves. They already have the required ingredients to cut out the middleman in search of greater profitability. The only question is: when? Instacart knows what shoppers want cross-category—when, where, and how—irrespective of retailer format. What if Instacart were to leverage its data assets on shopper behavior and loyalty to predict consumer demand, its expansive product library to build the perfect assortment, and their know-how of what it takes to pick and deliver profitably to go direct-to-consumer—ultimately cutting out the retailer at a much lower cost to the consumer?
Instacart has established direct relationships with manufacturers, primarily focused on digital promotions today. For top retailers, sales facilitated by Instacart grew to 15% of total retail sales and represented 100% of those retailers’ year-over-year growth in 2020. If Instacart drives the majority of retail growth, manufacturers will continue to shift funds from in-store tactics to Instacart’s platform, and it is not a huge leap to imagine Instacart establishing direct-buying relationships with brands.
The balancing act of present and future e-commerce fulfillment
Looking forward, as we lap the record 2020 year of grocery e-commerce, retailers must balance their long-term strategies with the immediate benefits and growth Instacart delivers. Regardless of retailer size, format, or geographical location, Instacart cannot be ignored. Retailers must be strategic in leveraging Instacart’s capabilities to their advantage. Only time will tell what the lasting effects will be of outsourcing what is now intrinsic to the grocery shopping experience: consumers’ ability to shop in-store and online for what they want.